← Logbook
ErgonomicsSemester 1 · 2025

Floating Granary

Flood-proof crop storage for farmers on Assam’s river islands, built from bamboo and coconut husk.

ProgrammeM.Des, IIT Guwahati
TeamAshfaque Salahudeen, Bhumika Batra, Pradyumn, Reetika Singharia, Shravani Dhumane
FocusErgonomics · Flood resilience · Sustainable materials
Render of the bamboo deck on coconut-husk pontoons
39.58%of Assam is flood-prone
81.6%of surveyed farmers report crop damage
70.4%report damage to stored produce
Context

Every monsoon, floods on the Brahmaputra’s char (river island) areas destroy stored grain, wiping out a year’s food and income for families who live almost entirely off rice, jute and seasonal vegetables.

Problem

Traditional raised platforms, earthen pots and hanging baskets work for small floods but fail in long ones, while silos and hermetic bags are too costly or not built to float.

What we found
01

Safe lifting limits

Ergonomic guidance for agricultural work puts safe loads around 20–25 kg for men and 15–20 kg for women, so one person should never handle more than a single sack.

02

Stack below the shoulder

Stack height was capped at about 140–145 cm, the shoulder height of a 5th-percentile woman, to avoid overhead lifting.

03

Cost decides adoption

A market study of ten storage types showed the gap: nothing cheap, buoyant, repairable and locally made at the same time.

Solution

A raft that holds three sacks

Twenty material concepts were compared in a Pugh chart. The winner: a bamboo platform on two rolled bundles of coconut husk netted with fishing net and tied with coir.

85 kgloaded weight (raft 25 kg + 3 sacks)
≈112 kgnet lift from the husk pontoons
₹50–350estimated cost per unit
Two people carrying the raft, line drawing
Map of Assam with the Brahmaputra and Goalpara marked
Reflection

Ergonomics here meant more than handles: loads, stacking height, cost and what happens to the materials after the flood all had to fit how char farmers already live.

The full story
01 · Users

Who stores the grain

Char farmers are small landholders with little access to consistent government aid, but deep river knowledge: they already build stilt houses and move grain to community halls (namghars), schools and embankments when the water rises. Our job was to fit that culture, not replace it.

  • Rice, jute and seasonal vegetables are almost the whole livelihood
  • Storage today: mud-plastered bins, raised bamboo platforms, earthen pots and drums, hanging baskets
  • All of them fail in long floods
02 · Bodies

Ergonomic challenges in a flood

We mapped what storing and moving grain does to the body. Farmers in Assam are shorter on average (men ≈163–167 cm, women ≈151–155 cm), so loft storage means overhead lifts. Sacks often weigh 25–30 kg, beyond safe limits, and get heavier and slipperier when wet.

  • Stepping down into boats with 20–30 kg on the shoulder twists the trunk and loads the knees
  • Rope and rough sack edges cut into smaller hands, worse when wet
  • Many trips through waterlogged ground add up to chronic back, hip and knee injuries
Illustrated ergonomic challenges: lifting, stacking and carrying sacks in floods
Ergonomic challenges we mapped
03 · Rules

Design rules from the research

The research turned into four hard rules for any concept.

  • Keep each load at or under 20–25 kg for men and 15–20 kg for women
  • Never stack above ≈140–145 cm, the shoulder of a 5th-percentile woman
  • Design for two-person carry: handles on opposite ends at waist height, centre of gravity marked
  • Let units connect into one floating platform, so farmers move a raft, not every sack
Ergonomic considerations: weight limits, stacking height, double handles, interconnection
Turning research into rules
04 · Ideas

Twenty concepts, one chart

A morphology chart crossed buoyancy devices, materials (bamboo, banana stem, HDPE, PVC, coconut husk, tyres), water protection, connections and handles. That produced twenty concepts, from bottle pontoons and half-drum boats to banana-stem rafts.

Morphology chart of buoyancy, materials, protection, connection and handle options
Concept sketches 1 to 10
Concept sketches 11 to 20
05 · Decision

Scoring them honestly

A Pugh chart scored the concepts on cost, ergonomics, portability, durability, multi-use, sustainability, ease of making, flotation, flood resistance and modularity. Coconut husk with bamboo came out ahead: nearly free, buoyant, local and compostable.

Pugh chart comparing ten concepts across criteria
Final concept: bamboo platform on husk pontoons for three gunny bags
06 · Proof

Will it float?

We checked buoyancy by hand: two husk rolls 30 cm across and 2 m long displace about 141 kg of water, for a net lift of about 112 kg. The loaded raft weighs 85 kg, so it floats with margin. Most materials are already on the farm, so cost runs from about ₹50 to ₹350.

Buoyancy and weight calculation
07 · Lifecycle

Before, during and after the flood

The husk isn’t waste at any stage. Before the monsoon it stands as a husk wall for farm shelter; during the flood it floats the grain; afterwards it becomes coir rope or compost for the next season.

Journey map from husk collection to compost
Three phases: husk wall, floating product, coir and compost
What I learned

Takeaways

  1. 01Ergonomics in rural design is about loads, heights and repeated trips, not just handles.
  2. 02Anthropometric data from the actual population (not generic tables) changes the numbers that matter.
  3. 03A Pugh chart is most useful when the criteria include cost and cultural fit, not only performance.
  4. 04Simple physics on paper (buoyancy, net lift) can make a concept believable before any prototype.
  5. 05Thinking about end-of-life early turned a material choice into a sustainability story.